Settrini

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WINSTON DURRELL SETTRINI, Case No.: 3:20-cv-02273-RBM-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 4 TO

INTRODUCE EVIDENCE OF

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, et al.,

PLAINTIFF’S DRUG POSSESSION

Defendants. [Doc. 65] 16 17 Presently before the Court is Defendants’ motion in limine No. 4 to introduce evidence of Plaintiff’s drug possession (“Motion in limine No. 4”). (Doc. 65.) Plaintiff filed a memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to Defendants’ Motion in limine No. 4 (“Opposition”). (Doc. 73.) In Defendants’ Motion in limine No. 4, Defendants seek to introduce evidence of Plaintiff’s possession of drugs at the time he fled from Defendants as evidence of his motive to flee and resist arrest. (See Doc. 65 at 1.) Defendants argue that evidence of Plaintiff’s possession of a bag containing marijuana and pills and another bag containing a “white powdery substance” is relevant…