Morton

Morton v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 20233:21-cv-01428California5,588 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARILYN MORTON, et al., Case No. 21-cv-1428-MMA-DDL

Plaintiffs,

ORDER OVERRULING

v. DEFENDANT COUNTY OF SAN

DIEGO’S RULE 72 OBJECTION

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al.,

Defendants. [Doc. No. 105] 16 17 18 Marilyn Morton (“Ms. Morton”), as successor in interest to Decedent Joseph Earl Morton’s (“Mr. Morton”) estate, as well as Ms. Morton and Dean Morton as individuals (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), bring this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the County of San Diego (the “County”), Samantha Macanlalay, Bijan Rahmani, Hosanna Alto, Matthew Berlin, Liberty Healthcare, and Does 1–10. See Doc. No. 28 (“Third Amended Complaint” or “TAC”). The County objects to and seeks reconsideration of United States Magistrate Judge David D. Lesner’s June 27, 2023 discovery order (the “Discovery Order”). Plaintiffs filed an opposition, to which the County replied. See Doc. Nos. 115, 118. For the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.