Rittel

Rittel v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 20233:23-cv-01075California921 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 WILLIAM RITTEL, Case No. 23-cv-1075-BAS-MSB

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING JOINT

v. MOTION FOR AWARD OF

ATTORNEY’S FEES, EXPENSES,

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, AND COSTS (ECF No. 11) Defendant.

17

In this Social Security matter, the Court granted joint motion to remand to the Agency for further proceedings. (ECF No. 8.) Now before the Court is a joint motion for an award of attorney’s fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff seeks an award of attorney’s fees and expenses of $1,500.00 under the EAJA and zero in costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920. The Government joins in the request, with the parties submitting that their “stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for EAJA attorney fees.” (Id.) 27 28 I. THE GOVERNMENT’S POSITION WAS NOT SUBSTANTIALLY JUSTIFIED…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.