Dean

Dean v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 7, 20233:23-cv-01021California1,332 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID ANTHONY DEAN, Case No.: 23cv1021 CAB (BGS)

Petitioner,

ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF

v. FINAL JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Respondents. 16 On May 26, 2023, Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a document using the initial cover page of a habeas form, which was docketed as a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 [“Petition”]. (ECF No. 1.) In an Order issued on June 6, 2023, the Court dismissed the Petition without prejudice for failure to satisfy the filing fee requirement, failure to use the proper form, failure to name a proper Respondent, failure to state a cognizable federal claim, and failure to allege exhaustion of state judicial remedies and directed that in order to proceed with the habeas action, Petitioner must both satisfy the filing fee requirement and file a First Amended Petition that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.