E.V.E.
E.V.E. v. Grossmont Union High School District
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 E.V.E., Case No.: 22-cv-941-RSH-BGS
Plaintiff,
ORDER AFFIRMING DECISION OF
v. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE
GROSSMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL [ECF Nos. 17, 20]
DISTRICT,
15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Plaintiff E.V.E., by and through her parent and guardian ad litem, Erin V.E. (“Ms. V.E.”), appeals an April 1, 2022 decision of an administrative law judge (the “ALJ’s Decision”) under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (the “IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. § 1415(i)(2)(A). The ALJ’s Decision determined that Defendant Grossmont Union High School District (the “District”) had provided Plaintiff with an individualized education program (“IEP”) that offered a free appropriate public education (“FAPE”) in the least restrictive environment. In this appeal, Plaintiff alleges several errors by the ALJ; the District asks this Court to affirm the ALJ’s Decision. The Parties have fully briefed their positions, and the Court…