Hoffman
Hoffman v. New Flyer of America, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 WARREN HOFFMAN and LONDELL Case No.: 22-cv-120-W-BLM
HUEY,
ORDER GRANTING
Plaintiffs, DEFENDANT KIDDE v. TECHNOLOGIES INC.’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
NEW FLYER OF AMERICA, INC.;
JUDGMENT [DOC. 32] KIDDE TECHNOLOGIES INC.; and DOES 1-25,
19 Defendants. 20 21 Pending before the Court is Defendant Kidde Technologies Inc.’s (“Kidde”) 22 Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 (the “Motion”) [Doc. 32]. 23 Defendant New Flyer of America Inc. (“New Flyer”) joins the Motion and likewise 24 moves for an order granting summary judgment in favor of New Flyer on the bases stated 25 in the Motion. (Joinder of New Flyer of America Inc. in the Motion for Summary 26 Judgment of Kidde Technologies Inc. [Doc. 33] at 2.) Plaintiffs Warren Hoffman and 27 28 Londell Huey oppose the Motion. (See Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 41].) The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted and without…