Homefed Village III Master, LLC v. Otay Landfill, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 6, 20233:20-cv-00784California7,953 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 HOMEFED VILLAGE III MASTER, ) Case No. 3:20-cv-0784-L-JLB LLC; ) ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT vs. ) OTAY LANDFILL’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND

) DENYING MOTION TO EXCLUDE OTAY LANDFILL, INC et al; ) REPORT AND TESTIMONY OF ) EXPERT WITNESSES GARY

MCCUE AND SIN SENH [ECF NO.

Defendants. ) 124.] ) 17 ) )

19 Pending before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion to 20 Exclude Report and Testimony of Expert Witnesses Gary McCue and Sin Senh filed 21 by Defendant Otay Landfill (“OLI”). [ECF No. 124]. Defendant American Recycling 22 International, Inc. d/b/a LKQ (“LKQ”) and Plaintiff HomeFed filed Responses in 23 Opposition. OLI filed Replies. The matter is submitted on the briefs without oral 24 argument. See Civ. L. R. 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons stated below, Defendant OLI’s 25…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.