Wright

Wright v. Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 20233:22-cv-01954California4,984 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOAN WRIGHT, individually and on Case No. 22-cv-1954-BAS-BLM behalf of others similarly situated,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 v. (1) GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART

ULTA SALON, COSMETICS &

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

FRAGRANCE, INC.,

LEAVE TO FILE THE SECOND

16 Defendant. AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF No. 14); and

18 (2) TERMINATING AS MOOT

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

DISMISS THE FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF

21 No. 13)

Before the Court is Plaintiff Joan Wright’s Motion for Leave to File her Proposed Second Amended Complaint (“Motion”). (See Mot., ECF No. 4; Mem. in Supp. of Mot. (“Mem.”), EC No. 14-1; Proposed Second Am. Compl. (“Proposed SAC”), ECF No. 14- 3.) Defendant Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc. (“Ulta”) opposes (Opp’n, ECF No. 15), citing essentially the same grounds for dismissal that it proffered in its Motion to Dismiss Wright’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.