Wright
Wright v. Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc.
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 20233:22-cv-01954California4,984 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOAN WRIGHT, individually and on Case No. 22-cv-1954-BAS-BLM behalf of others similarly situated,
ORDER:
Plaintiff, 13 v. (1) GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART
ULTA SALON, COSMETICS &
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
FRAGRANCE, INC.,
LEAVE TO FILE THE SECOND
16 Defendant. AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF No. 14); and
18 (2) TERMINATING AS MOOT
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO
DISMISS THE FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF
21 No. 13)
Before the Court is Plaintiff Joan Wright’s Motion for Leave to File her Proposed Second Amended Complaint (“Motion”). (See Mot., ECF No. 4; Mem. in Supp. of Mot. (“Mem.”), EC No. 14-1; Proposed Second Am. Compl. (“Proposed SAC”), ECF No. 14- 3.) Defendant Ulta Salon, Cosmetics & Fragrance, Inc. (“Ulta”) opposes (Opp’n, ECF No. 15), citing essentially the same grounds for dismissal that it proffered in its Motion to Dismiss Wright’s…