Hipschman
Hipschman v. County of San Diego
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CAROLINA HIPSCHMAN, an Case No.: 22-cv-00903-AJB-BLM individual; ALEXANDER 12 HIPSCHMAN, an individual, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ Plaintiffs, MOTION TO DISMISS 14 v. (Doc. No. 32) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, a public 16 entity; NIDIA ROMERO, an individual; ELIZABETH SAMUELS, an individual; JOSE PADILLA, an individual; MARY 18 SHEHEE, an individual; DOE HHSA WORKERS 2-10, known but unidentified individuals; and DOES 1 20 THROUGH 20, inclusive, 21 Defendants. 22 23 This is a civil rights action arising out of the County of San Diego’s social workers’ decision to remove then nine-month-old C.H. from his parents’ care during a hospital visit. C.H.’s parents, Plaintiffs Carolina Hipschman (“Ms. Hipschman”) and Alexander Hipschman (“Mr. Hipschman”), filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against Defendants County of San Diego (“County”) and its social workers Nidia Romero (“Ms. Romero”), Jose 1 …