Sernoffsky
Sernoffsky v. Novak
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SUSAN SERNOFFSKY, et al., Case No. 23-cv-0039-MMA-WVG
Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE
v. MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING
ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY
MATT NOVAK, et al.,
JUDGMENT
Defendants. [Doc. No. 29] 15 16 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. See Doc. No. 24. Defendants’ motion is currently set for hearing on September 25, 2023, meaning that Plaintiffs must file their opposition on or before September 11, 2023, see CivLR 7.1.e.2, and Defendants’ reply is due no later than September 18, 2023, see CivLR 7.1.e.3. On September 11, 2023, Plaintiffs filed an ex parte motion to continue the September 25 hearing on Defendants’ motion. See Doc. No. 30. Plaintiffs ask the Court to take the matter off calendar, and therefore vacate the remaining briefing schedule, and reset the briefing and hearing on the matter once Judge Gallo rules on an outstanding discovery dispute. According to…