Dalrymple

Dalrymple v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 20233:23-cv-00346California473 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERIC D., Case No. 23-cv-346-MMA-WVG

Plaintiff,

AMENDED ORDER

v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. 16 17 On February 22, 2023, Eric D. filed this social security appeal challenging the denial of his application for Supplemental Security Income benefits pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). See Doc. No. 1 ¶¶ 1–2. On March 30, 2023, the Court referred the matter to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge for report and recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Civil Local Rule 72.1. See Doc. No. 9. On June 7, 2023, the parties jointly moved to remand this action to the Social Security Administration. See Doc. No. 13. The assigned United States Magistrate Judge granted the motion and remanded the matter, see Doc. No. 14, and the Clerk of Court entered judgment, accordingly, see Doc. No. 15. It appears now that this was the inadvertent result of oversight, see 28 U.S.C. § 636(1)(A)–(B); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; CivLR 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.