Allen

Allen v. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 5, 20233:20-cv-01389California2,062 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL ALLEN, Case No.: 20-CV-1389 JLS (MDD)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION AND

DIAZ, et al.,

DETERMINING THAT IN FORMA

Defendant. PAUPERIS STATUS SHOULD

CONTINUE ON APPEAL

(ECF Nos. 95, 100)

18 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff-Appellant Michael Allen’s Objection to Order Granting Defendant[’s] Motion to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint on Defendant Theresa Currier (“Obj.,” ECF Nos. 95), which the Court, in its discretion, liberally construes as a motion for reconsideration. Also before the Court is the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals’ Referral Notice (“Referral,” ECF No. 100) requesting that this Court determine whether in forma pauperis (“IFP”) status should continue for Plaintiff-Appellant. For the reasons provided below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff-Appellant’s Motion for 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.