Castillo

Castillo v. Bureau of Prisons

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 20233:23-cv-00867California2,297 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE L. CASTILLO, Case No.: 23cv867-LL-KSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER

v. (1) GRANTING IN FORMA BUREAU OF PRISONS

PAUPERIS APPLICATION

Defendant.

AND

(2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR

FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915

19 [ECF No. 3] 20 21 This matter is before the Court on behalf of Plaintiff Jose L. Castillo (“Plaintiff”). Plaintiff filed this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). ECF No. 1 (“Compl.”). Plaintiff seeks to hold the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) liable for damages based on a delayed release date of approximately one month beyond a 120-month sentence. Id. at 2. Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) but has instead filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). ECF No. 3. I. IFP MOTION Under 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.