Langer

Langer v. Roya Nikzad PHD Allergy & Acupuntcure

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 20233:22-cv-02050California3,497 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRIS LANGER, Case No.: 3:22-cv-02050-RBM-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. REMAND ROYA NIKZAD PHD ALLERGY &

ACUPUNCTURE,

15 Defendant. 16 [Doc. 9] 17 18 Before the Court is Plaintiff Chris Langer’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Remand. (Doc. 9.) Defendant Roya Nikzad PHD Allergy & Acupuncture (“Defendant”) has filed an Opposition (Doc. 12), and Plaintiff filed a Reply (Doc. 13). Additionally, Defendant filed a Sur-Reply. (Doc. 16.) For the reasons set forth below, the Motion to Remand is GRANTED and this case is REMANDED to state court. I. BACKGROUND A. Procedural History Plaintiff’s Complaint was initially filed in San Diego Superior Court and then removed by Defendant to this Court. (Doc. 1.) Defendant’s Notice of Removal asserts 28 this Court has subject matter jurisdiction based on federal question. (Doc. 1 at 2. ) Shortly after the case was removed,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.