Cash

Cash v. Simmons

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 20233:22-cv-02065California1,802 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Steven CASH, Case No.: 22-cv-2065-AGS-DEB Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART

MOTIONS TO DISMISS (ECF 4 & 6),

v.

REMANDING CASE, AND DENYING

James E. SIMMONS, Jr., et al., REMAINING MOTIONS AS MOOT (ECF 11 & 34) Defendants.

As plaintiff essentially seeks reversal of his state-court conviction, this Court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. The case is dismissed and remanded to state court. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Steven Cash originally brought suit in San Diego Superior Court against San Diego County,1 the San Diego Sheriff’s Department, and several Superior Court judges regarding his treatment in state criminal prosecutions that ended in his guilty plea. (ECF 1-3.) Cash seeks the reversal of his conviction as well as various remedies predicated upon that reversal, such as injunctive relief “for the arrest and removal of” defendants; restoration of his “right to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.