Lewis

Lewis v. CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 12, 20233:21-cv-01385California935 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 Marva LEWIS, Case No.: 21-cv-01385-JAH-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER FOR IN-PERSON

v. DEPOSITION OF DR. CARROLL

CORECIVIC OF TENNESSEE, LLC, et [ECF 49] al., 13 Defendant.

15 On September 6, 2023, the parties contacted the Court with a dispute about 16 whether Defendant’s expert witness, Dr. Matthew F. Carroll, must submit to an in-person 17 deposition as provided in the deposition notice served by Plaintiff or whether he may be 18 deposed remotely as Defendant has requested. For the following reasons, the Court 19 ORDERS that Plaintiff’s deposition of Dr. Carroll occur in person. 20 The court may on motion order that a deposition be taken by telephone or other 21 remote means. Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(4). “The Court’s analysis proceeds in two steps: 22 (1) the proponent must advance a legitimate reason for seeking a remote deposition; and 23 (2) if the movant articulates a legitimate reason, then the burden shifts to the opposing 24 party to make a particularized…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.