Anderson

Anderson v. Del Toro

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 20233:23-cv-01615California1,838 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAULA A. ANDERSON, Case No.: 23cv1615-JES (KSC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE CARLOS DEL TORO, Secretary of the

TO PROCEED IN FORMA

Navy, PAUPERIS; Defendant. 16 (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO SCREENING UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e); and

(3) DENYING WITHOUT

PREJUDICE MOTION TO APPOINT

COUNSEL

21 [ECF Nos. 2, 3]

23 On September 1, 2023, Plaintiff Paula Anderson filed the instant action, alleging various violations related to her prior employment. ECF No. 1. Plaintiff filed a concurrent motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and motion to appoint counsel. ECF Nos. 2, 3. After due consideration and for the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES the motion to proceed IFP, DISMISSES Plaintiff’s complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), and DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.