Wilson

Wilson v. Santana

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 14, 20233:23-cv-00250California1,108 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GERALD J. WILSON, Case No.: 3:23-cv-00250-RBM-DDL

CDCR #B93800,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. (1) GRANTING MOTION FOR 14 RECONSIDERATION [Doc. 10]; and

J. SANTANA, et al., (2) EXTENDING TIME FOR

16 Defendants. PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO COURT ORDER 18 Gerald J. Wilson (“Plaintiff” or “Wilson”), filed a civil rights action (“Compl.”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in this Court on February 6, 2023. (Doc. 1.) On June 5, 2023, the Court granted Wilson IFP status and screened his Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e) and 1915A, dismissing Defendants Castro, Igbinosa, Motes, Bojorquez, Rimbach, Bacomfield, Rhordanz, Zepp, Furlong, Eaken, Rowland, Garcia, Ackvendo, and Geiwitz without prejudice and without leave to amend in this action because they were improperly joined pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 18 and 20. (Doc. 7.) The Court also concluded Wilson’s First and Eighth Amendment claims against Defendants 27…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.