Justin S. Beck v. State of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Justin S. BECK, Case No.: 23-cv-0164-AGS-DDL Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT (ECF 2) AND DENYING v.

REMAINING MOTIONS AS MOOT

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., (ECF 12, 18, 20, 26)

7 Defendants.

This complaint suffers from the same fatal flaws that doomed those in plaintiff’s past cases—it is unintelligible. See, e.g., Beck v. Super. Ct. of Cal., Cty. of Orange, 23-cv-0882-AGS-DDL (S.D. Cal. Sept. 13, 2023), ECF 16 (order dismissing complaint); Beck v. Catanzarite Law Corp., 22-cv-1616-AGS-DDL (S.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2023), ECF 35 (same). So it too must be dismissed. BACKGROUND This lawsuit and several related ones1 seem to have arisen in response to a securities action against plaintiff Justin Beck in 2018. According to Beck, attorney Kenneth Catanzarite (a defendant here) and his shareholder clients brought that securities case “to defraud” Beck. (ECF 2, at 16.) When Beck filed disciplinary …