Cervantes

Cervantes v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 14, 20233:21-cv-01161California6,589 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EVA C, Case No.: 21cv1161-LR

Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING JOINT

v. MOTION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting [ECF No. 13] Commissioner of Social Security,2 15 Defendant. 16 17 On June 24, 2021, Eva C. (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of a decision by the Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant”) denying Plaintiff’s application for social security disability benefits. (ECF No. 1.) Now pending before the Court is the parties’ “Joint Motion” seeking judicial review. (ECF No. 13 (“J. Mot.”).) For the reasons discussed below, the Court ORDERS

24 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(e)(6)(b), the Court’s opinions in Social Security cases filed under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) “refer to any non-government parties by using only their first name and last initial.” 26 Plaintiff named Andrew Saul, who was the Acting Commissioner of Social Security when Plaintiff 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.