Beck

Beck v. Superior Court of California, County of Orange

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 13, 20233:23-cv-00882California2,144 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Justin S. BECK, Case No.: 23-cv-0882-AGS-DDL Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF

LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA

v.

PAUPERIS (ECF 3) AND

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, DISMISSING THE COMPLAINT

COUNTY OF ORANGE, AND OTHER MOTIONS (ECF 2 &

7 Defendants. 13)

Plaintiff’s motion to proceed without paying the initial filing fee is granted. But his complaint does not state a claim for relief and lacks federal subject-matter jurisdiction. So, the Court dismisses the case with leave to amend. MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS Typically, parties instituting a civil action in a United States district court must pay filing fees of $402.1 See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). But if granted the right to proceed in forma pauperis, a plaintiff can proceed without paying the fee. Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). Plaintiff has a checking account containing about $1,000, no savings, and one asset—a car worth $10,000, on which he…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.