Correll

Correll v. Amazon.com, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 20233:21-cv-01833California2,874 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JONATHAN CORRELL, on behalf of Case No.: 3:21-cv-01833-BTM-MDD himself and all others similarly situated,

ORDER DENYING IN PART AND

Plaintiffs, GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT v. AMAZON.COM, INC.’S MOTION TO

DISMISS

AMAZON.COM, INC., and DOES 1-10, 15 Defendants. [ECF NO. 25]

19 Defendant Amazon.com, Inc (“Amazon”) has filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s 20 Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 25 (“Def.’s MTD”).) In response, Plaintiff Jonathan 21 Correll (“Correll”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 26 (“Pls.’ Opp’n”)). Defendant 22 Amazon then filed a reply. (ECF No. 28 (“Def.’s Reply”).) For the reasons discussed 23 below, the Court grants in part and denies in part Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss.

25 26 1 I. BACKGROUND Correll, on behalf of himself and a potential class, filed suit against Amazon alleging unequal treatment and discrimination in Amazon’s Seller Certification program, Guided Buying policy, and other…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.