Sanchez

Sanchez v. Martinez

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 18, 20233:23-cv-01561California2,149 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NAKUNTA SANCHEZ, Case No.: 23-cv-1561-WQH-AHG

Petitioner, ORDER v. 13 KELLY MARTINEZ and THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondents. 17 HAYES, Judge: 18 Petitioner Nakunta Sanchez, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a Petition 19 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF No. 1.) Petitioner has also 20 filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (ECF No. 2.)

MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

22 Upon review of Petitioner’s affidavit and accompanying prison certificate (see ECF 23 No. 2 at 1-4), Petitioner has $0.00 on account at the California correctional institution in 24 which he is presently confined (see id. at 4) and cannot afford the $5.00 filing fee. Thus, 25 the Court GRANTS Petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and allows Petitioner 26 to prosecute the above-referenced action without being required to prepay fees or costs and 27 without being required to post security. 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.