Ganey

Ganey v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 20233:23-cv-01448California886 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 MICHELLE DIANE GANEY AND Case No.: 23-cv-1448-CAB-AHG

MICHAEL JAMES GANEY, JR.,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

Plaintiffs, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS v. AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; Child 17 Welfare Services (CWS), et al,

18 Defendants. [Doc. Nos. 2, 3]

20 On August 7, 2023, Michelle Diane Ganey and Michael James Ganey, Jr. 21 (“Plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and their minor children, T.E.W, T.A.W., and 22 M.J.G., filed a complaint [Doc. No. 1] against the San Diego County Child Welfare 23 Services and multiple caseworkers for violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and various state 24 laws. Plaintiffs also filed a motion to appoint counsel. [Doc. No. 3]. Plaintiffs did not 25 prepay the civil filing fees required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) at the time of filing; instead, 26 they filed a Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 27 28 [Doc. No. 2]. For the reasons set forth, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.