N.A.
N.A. v. Jaddou
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 N.A., Case No.: 23-cv-01634-AJB-BGS Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING INDIVIDUAL
v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO UR M. JADDOU, in her official capacity PROCEED PSEUDONYMOUSLY 14 as Director of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services; and RENA (Doc. No. 2) BITTER, in her official capacity as 16 Assistant Secretary of State for Consular Affairs, Defendants.
19 Before the Court is Plaintiff N.A.’s Motion to Proceed Under Pseudonym. (Doc. No. 20 2.) Defendants have not responded to these motions, and the Court therefore finds them 21 UNOPPOSED pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(f)(3)(c). For the reasons set forth below, 22 the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed Under Pseudonym. 23 District courts have broad discretion in determining whether parties may proceed 24 anonymously. Does I thru XXIII v. Advanced Textile Corp., 214 F.3d 1058, 1068 (9th Cir. 25 2000). Although the “normal presumption is for parties to use their real names,” Doe v. 26 Kamehameha Sch./Bernice Pauahi…