Mullins

Mullins v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20233:22-cv-00985California5,696 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAKONNIE M., Case No.: 22cv985-LR

Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING JOINT

v. MOTION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting [ECF No. 19] Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 17 On July 6, 2022, Lakonnie M. (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of a decision by the Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant”) denying Plaintiff’s application for social security disability benefits. (ECF No. 1.) Now pending before the Court is the parties’ “Joint Motion for Judicial Review” seeking judicial review (“Joint Motion”). (ECF No. 19 (“J. Mot.”).) For the reasons discussed below, the final decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings.

26 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(e)(6)(b), the Court’s opinions in Social Security cases filed under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) “refer to any non-government parties by using only their first…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.