Arellano

Arellano v. Jones

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 20233:20-cv-00228California1,937 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAUL ARELLANO, Case No.: 3:20-cv-00228-RBM-LR

CDCR #AH-1995,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO CONSIDER SUR-

JONES, SIHOTANG; DR. MARTIN;

REPLY; AND

SANTILLAN; CDCR,

16 Defendants. (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

18 [Docs. 80, 82] 19 This case involves Plaintiff Raul Arellano’s (“Plaintiff”) Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment claims against Defendants R. Santillan, B. Martin, O. Sihotang, and F. Jones (“Defendants”), all medical officials at the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility, from June to July of 2019. (See Doc. 6, First Amended Complaint (“FAC”).) On June 28, 2023, the Court granted Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment in its entirety and entered judgment on their behalf. (See Docs. 75, 76.) Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s “Motion to Reconsider the Merits of his Sur-Reply” and “Motion for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.