Nash

Nash v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 20233:22-cv-01026California303 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHOCOLATE N., Case No.: 22-cv-1026-KSC

Plaintiff, Order on Joint Motion For Voluntary v. Remand to Agency Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) KILOLO KIJAKAZI, and Entry of Judgment [Doc. No. 37] Defendant. 16 Plaintiff filed this action challenging the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying plaintiff’s claim for benefits. Doc. No. 1. The parties jointly moved for remand under sentence for of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Doc No. 37 (the “Joint Motion”). Having reviewed the Complaint and the Joint Motion, the Court GRANTS the Joint Motion. Upon remand, the Commissioner will offer the claimant the opportunity of a hearing; offer the claimant an opportunity to submit additional evidence; reevaluate the opinions of record, as necessary, consistent with 20 C.F.R. § 416.927; if necessary, obtain new medical expert testimony; and proceed with the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.