Sanders

United States v. Sanders

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 20233:23-cv-01000California2,938 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No.: 23-cv-1000-W-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING IN PART

v. AND GRANTING IN PART THE

CITY OF SAN DIEGO AND

CHRISTOPHER SANDERS, an

BROWN FIELD MUNICIPAL

individual, TAC AIR OPS, LLC, AIRPORT’S MOTION TO

KAPOWSIN AIR SPORTS, LTD, THE

DISMISS [DOC. 23]

CITY OF SAN DIEGO, a municipality,

BROWN FIELD MUNICIPAL

19 AIRPORT, and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive,

21 Defendants. 22 23 Pending before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) filed by Defendants The City of San Diego and Brown Field Municipal Airport’s (collectively, the “Municipal Defendants”) [Doc. 23]. 27 28 The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Civ. R. 7.1(d)(1). For reasons discussed below, the Court DENIES IN PART and GRANTS IN PART the Motion [Doc. 23]. 4 I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff, the United…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.