Mallory

Mallory v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 20233:22-cv-01454California5,400 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER M., Case No.: 22-cv-1454-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON JOINT MOTION

v. FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, [Dkt. No. 11] Defendant.

17 18 Plaintiff Christopher M. seeks judicial review of the Social Security Commissioner’s denial of his application for disability benefits. See Dkt. No. 1. The parties have consented to the undersigned’s jurisdiction. Dkt. No. 4. Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion for Judicial Review, in which Plaintiff moves the Court to remand his application to the Social Security Administration for an award of benefits or, alternatively, for further proceedings. See generally Dkt. No. 11. For the reasons stated below, the Court finds the Commissioner’s determination that Plaintiff is not disabled is free of legal error and supported by substantial evidence and is therefore AFFIRMED. / / / …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.