Avalos

Smith v. Avalos

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20233:20-cv-01534California1,317 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARQUELL SMITH, Case No.: 20cv1534-JAH(LR)

CDCR #H-83007

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S

EXTENSION MOTION AND

Plaintiff,

REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT

v. OF COUNSEL

MS. AVALOS, Law Library Coordinator; [ECF No. 37] JOHN/JANE DOE, Medical Supervisor; JOHN/JANE DOE,, Defendants. 18 On September 8, 2023, Defendant Frances Abalos (“Defendant Abalos”) filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff Marquell Smith’s third amended complaint (“TAC”) in this case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (See Def.’s Mot. to Dismiss, ECF No. 33.) On September 15, 2023, the Court ordered Defendant Abalos to show cause why (1) her motion to dismiss should not be stricken as untimely, (2) she should not be required to file an answer to Plaintiff’s TAC, and (3) why Plaintiff should not thereafter be permitted to pursue discovery as to the identities of the unnamed Doe defendants in the TAC. (See Order to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.