Assadian

Assadian v. Oudkirk

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20233:22-cv-00921California5,415 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 HODA ASSADIAN, Case No.: 3:22-cv-00921-RBM-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

SCOTT M. OUDKIRK and ANTONY

BLINKEN,

13 Defendants. [Doc. 4] 14 15 On June 23, 2022, Plaintiff Hoda Assadian (“Plaintiff”) filed a Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Complaint for Injunctive Relief asserting a claim under the Administrative Procedures Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 701, and a claim under the Mandamus Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1361. (Doc. 1. (“Compl.”).) She seeks a Court order mandating Defendants Scott M. Oudkirk, Deputy Chief of Mission, U.S. Embassy in Turkey, and Antony Blinken, Secretary of the U.S. Department of State (collectively “Defendants”) process her parents’ immigration cases within fifteen calendar days. (Compl. ⁋ 40.) Defendants have filed a Motion to Dismiss that has been fully briefed. (Doc. 4 (Motion to Dismiss), Doc. 5 (Opp’n to Motion to Dismiss), Doc. 6 (Reply).1) For the reasons that follow,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.