Windy Cove, Inc. v. Circle K Stores, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 26, 20233:21-cv-01416California11,556 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WINDY COVE, INC., et al., Case No. 21-cv-1416-MMA-DEB

Plaintiffs, ORDER RE DAUBERT MOTIONS

AND MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY

v. JUDGMENT

CIRCLE K STORES, INC. and DOES 1– [Doc. Nos. 120, 125–28, 136] 20, 15 Defendants.

CIRCLE K STORES, INC.,

17 Counter-Claimant, 18 v.

UNIVERSITY CITY MOBIL AND

20 SOUTH BAY, et al., Counterclaim-Defendants. 22 23 Plaintiffs Windy Cove, Inc. (“Windy Cove”), HB Fuel, Inc. (“HB Fuel”), and Staffing and Management Group Inc. (“Staffing,” and together with Windy Cove and HB Fuel, “Plaintiffs”) bring this action against Defendant Circle K asserting claims for (1) breach of contract – breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing; (2) declaratory relief; and (3) unfair business practices in violation of California Business and Professions Code § 17200, et seq. See Doc. No. 27 (“FAC”). Defendant brings one counterclaim against all Plaintiffs and Counterclaim-Defendants Hamid Kalhor (“Kalhor”) and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.