Dlugos

Dlugos v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 20233:22-cv-00318California3,343 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOYCE M. D., Case No.: 3:22-cv-00318-BEN-DEB

Plaintiff,

ORDER: (1) ADOPTING-IN-PART

v. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; and (2) KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting

REMANDING TO THE

Commissioner of the Social Security COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL Administration,

SECURITY

16 Defendant. [Docket Nos. 14, 15, 16, and 19]

18 Plaintiff Joyce M. D. (“Plaintiff”) filed this action seeking judicial review of the 19 Social Security Commissioner’s (“Defendant”) denial of Supplemental Security Income 20 benefits. ECF No. 1. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment, and 21 Plaintiff replied. ECF Nos. 15, 16, 17. Magistrate Judge Daniel Butcher issued a Report 22 and Recommendation (“R&R”), which recommended this Court deny Plaintiff’s Motion 23 for Summary Judgment and Grant Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, thereby 24 affirming the decision of the Commissioner. ECF No. 19. Specifically,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.