Pattee

Pattee v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 20233:22-cv-00906California10,559 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID P., Case No.: 22cv906-LR

Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING JOINT v. MOTION FOR JUDICIAL

REVIEW

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting 14 Commissioner of the Social Security [ECF No. 18] Administration, Defendant. 17 On June 22, 2022, Plaintiff David P. (“Plaintiff”) filed a Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial review of a decision by the Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant”) denying Plaintiff’s application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits. (Compl., ECF No. 1.) Now pending before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion for Judicial Review. (See J. Mot. Judicial Review, ECF No. 18 (“J. Mot.”).) For the reasons set forth below, the Court ORDERS that judgement be entered reversing the decision of the Commissioner and remanding this matter for further administrative proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

27 1 In the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.