Cantu

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JESSE CANTU, Case No. 22-cv-1974-BAS-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO DISMISS TAPESTRY, INC., (ECF No. 20)

Defendant. 16 Now before the Court is Defendant Tapestry, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 20) Plaintiff Jesse Cantu’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) (ECF No. 19). Tapestry, Inc. does business as Coach.com (“Coach” or “Defendant”). Defendant argues that Plaintiff has failed to meet his burden under Federal Rule of Procedure (“Rule”) 12(b)(6) by failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Plaintiff, a consumer and data privacy advocate, filed an Opposition to the Motion (ECF No. 21), to which Defendant filed a Reply (ECF No. 22). The Court finds this matter suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. After considering parties’ briefing, the relevant law, and the…