Sernoffsky

Sernoffsky v. Novak

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20233:23-cv-00039California4,637 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SERNOFFSKY et al, Case No.: 23-CV-39-MMA(WVG)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER FOLLOWING DISCOVERY

v. CONFERENCE NOVAK et al, Defendants. 16 17 On August 3, 2023, Plaintiffs raised a discovery dispute with the Court. (ECF No. 22.) Plaintiffs sought to compel the production of redacted documents produced by Defendants in response to Plaintiffs’ Requests for Production (“RFPs”), No. 1, 2, and 4 propounded to Defendant Novak1, and attachments to emails withheld by Defendants Novak, Aguilar, and Scott. The Court ordered briefing on the discovery dispute and convened a discovery conference on August 18, 2023. (ECF No. 27.) Defendants also 24 25 1 Plaintiff propounded identical RFPs to Defendants Aguilar and Scott, although numbered 26 as RFP No. 3-6. Defendants Aguilar and Scott’s responses and the document production were identical to Defendant Novak’s responses to RFP No. 1, 2, and 4 and document production. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.