Marinkovic

Marinkovic v. Liberty Mutual Holding Company Incorporated

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 5, 20233:23-cv-01084California390 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MELVIN MARINKOVIC, Case No. 23-cv-1084-BAS

Plaintiff,

ORDER STAYING AND

v. ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSING

CASE

LIBERTY MUTUAL HOLDING,

Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Melvin Marinkovic proceeding pro se, commenced this action and moved to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF Nos. 1, 4.) On June 30, 2023, the Court issued an order denying the IFP motion without prejudice. (ECF No. 5.) The Court explained that the denial was without prejudice because Plaintiff used a standard form to complete his IFP motion, but the filing was missing a key page. (Id.) That page requires “Plaintiff to input information that would illuminate whether he has other streams of income—such as social security benefits, pensions, or public assistance—and/or liquid assets—namely money in bank accounts or other financial institutions.” (Id.) The Court gave Plaintiff several weeks to either pay the filing fee or submit adequate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.