Aliff

Aliff v. Vervent, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20233:20-cv-00697California3,709 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HEATHER TURREY, et al., Case No.: 20-cv-00697-DMS-AHG

Plaintiffs,

ORDER (1) DENYING PLAINTIFFS’

v. MOTION TO AMEND THE SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT; (2)

VERVENT, INC., et al.,

GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

Defendants. MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE

PLEADINGS; AND (3) DISMISSING

PLAINTIFFS’ UCL CLAIM

17 Presently before the Court, following a two week class action jury trial, is Plaintiffs’ request for equitable relief under California’s Unfair Competition Law, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200, et seq. (“UCL”). Because the UCL provides for equitable relief only, Plaintiffs were not entitled to trial by jury on that claim and the parties agreed the claim would be tried to the Court following the jury trial. The parties also agreed that no additional evidence would be necessary on the UCL claim and the Court could rule on the claim based upon the same evidence that was presented at the jury trial. Accordingly, the 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.