Jones

Jones v. Musk

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20233:23-cv-01799California647 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WAYNE E. JONES, Case No.: 3:23-CV-1799-JLS (AHG)

CDCR #BU-7712,

ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL

Plaintiff, ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE vs. FOR FAILING TO PAY

FILING FEE REQUIRED

BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) AND/OR

ELON MUSK, TESLA CO., SPACE X

FAILING TO MOVE TO PROCEED

INC., et al.,

IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Defendants. PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)

(ECF No. 1) 20 Plaintiff Wayne E. Jones, proceeding pro se and currently incarcerated at Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) has filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. ECF No. 1. FAILURE TO PAY FILING FEE OR REQUEST IFP STATUS All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of 27 28 $402. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.