Cousin

Cousin v. Sharp Healthcare

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 12, 20233:22-cv-02040California531 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 HANNAH COUSIN, et al., individually Case No.: 22-cv-2040-MMA-DDL and on behalf of all others similarly 11 situated, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL Plaintiffs,

13 v. [Doc. No. 30]

SHARP HEALTHCARE,

15 Defendant. 16 17 Pending before the Court is Defendant Sharp Healthcare’s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Consolidated Complaint. On October 9, 2023, Plaintiffs filed a redacted opposition, as well as a motion for leave to file an unredacted version of their opposition under seal. Plaintiffs’ motion to seal is unopposed to date. When presented with a request to file a document under seal, the Court begins with the strong presumption in favor of the “general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.” Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 n.7 (1978); see also Kamakana v. City and Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006). “The presumption of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.