Myles

Myles v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20233:15-cv-01985California5,320 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICKAIL MYLES, an individual, Case No. 3:15-cv-01985-JAH-BLM

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES

AND COSTS

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, by and through the SAN DIEGO COUNTY [ECF No. 445] SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, a public entity; and DEPUTY J. BANKS, an individual,

Defendants.

18

INTRODUCTION Pending before this Court is Plaintiff Mickail Myles’ motion for attorney fees and costs. Defendants County of San Diego and Deputy J. Banks filed an opposition and Plaintiff filed a reply. After careful consideration of the parties’ submissions and for the reasons set forth below, this Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Plaintiff’s motion. BACKGROUND On October 11, 2022, a jury returned a verdict in favor of Plaintiff and against of 28 U.S.C. section 1983, an unlawful policy, practice or custom in violation of 2 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.