Reed

Reed v. Paramo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20233:18-cv-00361California660 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MYCHAL ANDRA REED, Case No.: 18-CV-361 JLS (DEB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER RESPONDING TO

v. REFERRAL NOTICE

14 (ECF No. 313) D. PARAMO, et al., Defendants. 17 On February 26, 2018, Plaintiff Mychal Andra Reed—a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis (“IFP”)—filed a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against R.J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) staff, including Defendants Daniel Parama and E. Zendejas (collectively, “Defendants”). See ECF No. 3. Following the Court’s ruling on a motion to dismiss, see ECF No. 30, Plaintiff filed his Second Amended Complaint (“SAC,” ECF No. 60). After much back and forth between the Parties, Defendants moved for summary judgment. See ECF No. 181. The Court granted Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment as to all but one of the claims raised in the SAC. See ECF No. 249. In its Order granting partial summary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.