Chekanov

L1 Technologies, Inc. v. Chekanov

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20233:20-cv-00259California1,091 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13 L1 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; Case No.: 3:20-cv-00259-H-JLB 14 SYNCWISE, LLC; and PIXELS MATTER, LLC, PERMANENT INJUNCTION Plaintiffs, v. SERHII CHEKANOV, Defendant.

On August 30, 2023, the Court issued a Memorandum Decision in favor of Plaintiffs L1 Technologies, Inc., Syncwise, LLC, and Pixels Matter, LLC (“Plaintiffs”) and against Defendant Serhii Chekanov (“Defendant”). (Doc. No. 89.) That same day, the Court issued a judgment based on the Memorandum Decision indicating that the Court will issue a permanent injunction to protect Plaintiffs from future harm. (Doc. No. 90.) Accordingly, the Court incorporates the findings in the Memorandum Decision in support of this permanent injunction. 28 PERMANENT INJUNCTION A. Permanent Injunction In the Ninth Circuit, a plaintiff who seeks a permanent injunction must satisfy a four- factor test. See Kurin, Inc. v. Magnolia Med. Techs., Inc., 473…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.