Rodriguez, III v. Orange County
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 MARCUS RODRIGUEZ, III, and Case No.: 23-CV-823-W-DDL
VALERIE CASTANEDA,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
Plaintiffs, DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ v. MOTION TO DISMISS WITH
LEAVE TO AMEND [DOC. 9]
ORANGE COUNTY, CAMERON
17 MATHIS, DAVID PULTZ, and DOES 1 THROUGH 10, Defendants. 20 Pending before the Court is the County of Orange, Deputy Cameron Mathis, and Sergeant David Pultz’s (collectively “Defendants”) motion to dismiss portions of Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (“FAC” [Doc. 6]) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Plaintiffs Marcus Rodriguez, III, and Valerie Castaneda (collectively “Plaintiffs”) oppose. The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Civ. L.R. 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS IN PART 28 AND DENIES IN PART Defendants’ motion to dismiss [Doc. 9] WITH LEAVE TO AMEND. 3 I. BACKGROUND 5 …