Sundberg

Sundberg v. Wallace

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 3, 20233:23-cv-01155California1,055 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KELLY FRITHIOF SUNDBERG, Case No.: 23-cv-1155-RBM-DDL

Petitioner,

ORDER:

v. (1) DENYING AS MOOT JANINE WALLACE, Executive Director, PETITIONER’S NOTICE OF et al., HOLD; 15 16 Respondents. (2) SETTING AMENDED

BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON

HABEAS PETITION; and (3) DENYING PETITIONER’S SECOND MOTION TO

APPOINT COUNSEL

21 [Dkt. Nos. 6, 11]

Petitioner’s Notice of Hold (Dkt. No. 6) On August 1, 2023, Petitioner Kelly Frithiof Sundberg (“Petitioner”) filed a document captioned “Notice of Hold” [Dkt. No. 6] (“Notice”) wherein Petitioner states that an attorney advised him that the petition for writ of habeas corpus (“Petition”) in the instant matter “should be placed on hold until the matter is resolved, first in the higher court.” Dkt. No. 6…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.