Andrews

Azenta, Inc. v. Andrews

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 20233:22-cv-01952California665 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AZENTA, INC., Case No.: 22-cv-01952-JLS-JLB

Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTIONS TO FILE DOCUMENTS

UNDER SEAL

STEPHANIE ANDREWS, et al.,

Defendants. [ECF Nos. 39; 44] 16 Before the Court are Plaintiff Azenta, Inc.’s Motions to File Documents Under Seal. (ECF Nos. 39; 44.) In both motions, Plaintiff seeks to redact information from two exhibits attached to its motions1 to compel. (See ECF Nos. 38-2 at 6–7; 39; 43-2 at 6–7; 44.) 20 21 On October 2, 2023, Plaintiff filed both a motion to compel a forensic examination 22 of Defendants’ systems (ECF No. 38) and one of the instant motions to file documents under seal (ECF No. 39). In its motion to compel, Plaintiff improperly stated it submitted Exhibits A and B to the Omnibus Declaration of Donna Poole “via email in native format”. 24 (ECF No. 38- at 6–7.) On October 5, 2023, Plaintiff filed a notice of lodgment (ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.