Vena

Vena v. Moore, Schulman & Moore, APC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 12, 20233:22-cv-00437California6,720 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 22-cv-437-W-BLM NICHOLAS A. VENA,

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY

MOORE, SCHULMAN & MOORE, APC, et al.,

Defendants. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s September 14, 2023 Motion to Compel Discovery from Defendants Moore, Schulman & Moore, APC (“MSM”), Julie Westerman, and David Schulman (“Defendants”) [ECF No. 57 (“MTC”)], Defendants’ September 21, 2023 opposition to Plaintiff’s MTC [ECF No. 58 (“Oppo.”)], and Plaintiff’s September 28, 2023 reply [ECF No. 59 (“Reply”)]. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s MTC is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The instant matter was initiated in this Court on April 1, 2022 when Plaintiff filed a complaint alleging, , that Defendants deprived Plaintiff of his due process rights. ECF No. 1. On August 7,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.