Turner

Turner v. Eli Lily Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 17, 20233:23-cv-01722California1,134 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 || TERRANCE TURNER, Case No.: 23-CV-1722-JO-DDL Plaintiff, 13 || Vv. ORDER: (1) DISMISSING uycompany.eraL, COMPLAINT FURSUANT □□□ Defendants. 1915; and (2) DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS

17 18 19 On September 14, 2023, Terrance Turner (“Turner”) filed a lawsuit and a motion to 21 || proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) on behalf of another individual, Day Spencer. On behalf 22 || of Spencer, Turner alleges that doctors administered a dangerous drug to Spencer’s child. 23 || Dkt. at 4-6. Although Turner filed this case as the plaintiff, he was not involved in the 24 || facts of the case, and he did not suffer the injuries alleged in the complaint. See generally Nor is Turner a licensed attorney. For the reasons stated below, the Court DISMISSES Turner’s complaint under U.S.C. § 1915 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.