In re Franklin Wireless Corp. Derivative Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 11, 20233:21-cv-01837California912 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 In re FRANKLIN WIRELESS CORP. Case No.: 21-cv-1837-AJB-MSB

DERIVATIVE LITIGATION

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN

ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF

MARTIN’S ALLEGATIONS OF

“SHORT-SWING” PROFITS AS

PRECLUDED BY A PENDING

SETTLEMENT

17 (Doc. No. 70)

Before the Court is Defendants’ ex parte request for an Order Striking Plaintiff Martin’s allegations of “short-swing” profits as precluded by Defendants’ pending settlement in Nosirrah Management, LLC v. Franklin Wireless Corp. et al., Case No. 3:21- cv-01316-RSH (S.D. Cal.). (Doc. No. 70.) Having reviewed the ex parte application, Plaintiffs’ opposition, and Defendants’ reply, the Court DENIES Defendants’ request. I. IMPROPER REQUEST TO STRIKE ALLEGATIONS In their opening brief and reply, Defendants make clear that they request an Order striking Plaintiff Martin’s short-swing profits allegations so they may reach a settlement 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.